Subscribe to the Newspaper
View the Online Newspaper
Welcome
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

It's still OK to say ‘Redskins'

In response to Donna Krause’s request (“Mascot change earns thumbs up,” April 28 Appeal-Democrat) that the local papers refrain from using the term “Redskin”:

You have succeeded in removing a tradition that you clearly will never understand.

There are larger issues that you were elected to take care of. Whether you like it or not, these kids in this school are still Redskins. Don’t take that away from the last couple of classes that will graduate as Redskins. There, I said it: Redskins, Redskins, Redskins.

You can hide behind political correctness all you want, but you won’t remove my First Amendment right. Let the process that you put in place run its course for better or worse. There are a lot of people who disagree with your decision to remove this mascot, but we are forced to deal with the inevitable. So I am asking you to do the same until the name is changed. Maybe you can run for City Council and remove the Indian headdress from our seal as well, and while we are removing things that offend us, when is your seat up for election?


Greg Ponciano

Colusa

 


See archived 'Letters' stories »
 

Click to vote
Recommend this story?
Yes
No
The online vote: 11 1

Reader Comments
Users of this Web site are bound by the Freedom Communications Inc. user agreement, www.freedom.com/eula.html, which includes a prohibition on personal attacks, obscenity and potentially libelous statements, among other things. While we invite our readers to comment on stories, comments that violate the user agreement may be removed at any time by site moderators. Our software also allows users themselves to flag comments they believe to be inappropriate, and comments receiving multiple flags are removed automatically. For further information, please e-mail administrator


Reader's comments




If infact it is true that this came down to money then shame on the school board for selling out. I am ashamed to say that I have failed to contribute back to the school over the years but had I imagined that doing so might have prevented this decision I would have certainly contributed. I guess the alumni foundation will have to start all over again and only tap those individuals who don't consider themselves to be Redskins?

Steve \"Wally\" Clark - Jun 24, 2008 12:23:57 PM Remove Comment

 
Mr. Ponciano, Like I've heard before, it was all about the money. The school needs to get that darn wreck of stadium finished and they don't have any money. The casino has loads of dough, so give in to the indians, change the name, and presto a new stadium. Does anyone really believe that respect and/or political correctness has anything to do with it? The whole process and resulting decision was a snow job and a sell out for dirty money.

freeman - May 09, 2008 11:18:23 PM Remove Comment
 

Add your comments
Please follow and enforce these guidelines:
1. No flaming. Do not be hostile.
2. No comments that are obscene, vulgar, lewd, sexually-oriented, threatening, libelous, or illegal.
3. No racial slurs or insults.
4. "Remove Comment" flags offensive comment for removal.

Verification Code:
Enter Verification:
Your Name:
Your Comment:
By submitting this form, you agree to this site's terms of service




Weather
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Same-sex slapdown
What's your reaction to the state Supreme Court upholding the ban on same-sex marriage?
I'm glad to see the will of the majority of voters was supported.
I don't agree with it. Equal rights should be for all Californians.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
ADVERTISEMENT 
Games
Movie Listings
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site